Adherence & Retention
Alternative Less Expensive transmission from medication monitor to cell phone
Started by Thomas Moulding on 15 Nov 2010
From
Tom Moulding M.D.
Clinical Professor of Medicine
Harbor UCLA Medical Center
Torrance CA
Office phone 310 375 5980
From the postings so far from Drs, Haberer and Luk. I feel there are two problems for which I may have useful suggestions in the area of
A) Cost and
B) More Specific Information from a medication monitor
I have learned from William Thies previously at MIT, now working for Microscoft in India that used cell phones cost $10.00. There is a charitable recycling program in the United States
http://www.charitablerecycling.com/CR/home.asp
that collect used cell phones. 65% of phones they get are not usable but collecting them gets the toxic metals they contain out of circulation. The remaining 35% can be recycled and cost about $6.00 to $7.00. Therefore a retail price of $10.00 is not out of line.
The person I spoke to is Margaret Schneider.
1 800 527 4700 ext 226. The technical person to whom I have never spoken is
Matthew Bouren
Sales Manager
The Wireless Source
(800) 527 - 4700 Ext. 225
A thought given to me by a friend for employing used cell phones is the following
Place a cheap speaker on a medication monitor.
Have the speaker present the adherence record with a code.
One such code would be a DUAL TONE MULTI FREQUENCY CODE (DTMF CODE) which was the code used in the dial phones that I grew up with.
Have the patient place the speaker on the monitor next to the receiver on the “cheap” cell phone to send the code to a server, which would de-code the code and provide the adherence record to the care giver. It is not as expensive as built in cell phone transmission, but does not require as much patient intelligence or have as much potential for inaccurate recording as IVR or SMS.
The second suggestion would be to use a dose removal medication monitor instead of the wisepill device, which is a cover-opening monitor. While a cover opening monitor is the cheapest to construct, it has the limitations that 1) the caregiver does not know how much medication is removed when the cover is open, 2) the cover may be left open, or 3) if the cover is not opened for several days, the patient may claim he took medicine out for several days to take on a trip when in fact he did not take any medication and 4) a child or patient my play with device especially if a spring is incorporated.
The website www.medicationmonitors.net describes multiple designs for both cover opening medication monitors and dose removal medication monitors. These were developed primarily for TB medications. Because one of the medications, Ethambutol, is very hygroscopic most of our effort has been directed to the Stack Monitor for Packaged Medications which protects against ambient moisture. If the HIV medications are not hygroscopic. the other designs described on the website could be used. I should think that the trace sheet monitor would be the most applicable.
Tom Moulding M.D.

Jessica Haberer, MD, MS
Hi Tom,
expand commentThanks for your posting and the contact information for the recycled phones.
I think you make some excellent points. As I mentioned in my previous post, we had a lot of challenges with the IVR and SMS, mostly because we required specific actions from individuals. Namely, we asked them to answer a call or SMS with a PIN and a number. While simple, it was much more difficult than we thought. I wonder if the use of the recycled phone and the medication monitor speaker would have similar problems. Revised training techniques have greatly improved our yield, but I've found the passive data collection with the WIsepill to be much more reliable. As you point out, they are not perfect in that people may not use them or they may misuse them; however, the only action required of the individual is to open the lid to take his/her pills as would be required with any pill container. As with most situations, I think a variety of approaches are needed, and we need data and experience to decide which work the best.
I completely agree with your idea of dose removal control and would love to see ...
8:16 AM, 16 Nov 2010 | Permalink
Donald Ellis
Jessica,
In regard to your question about using a speaker in the monitor and a cell phone to transmit a PIN and a number: This should be quite simple. My preferred approach would employ DTMF tones. These are the same tones which are sent when you enter a number on the keypad in a phone. DTMF stands for Dual Tone Multi-Frequency. Each tone is actually the sum of waveforms with two frequencies. Since each distinct tone corresponds to a digit or special character (# or *) sending numbers is quite easy if the monitor incorporates a DTMF generator. A DTMF decoder at the receiving end (e.g. in the clinic) would decode the tones into their corresponding digits. Alphabetic information can also be sent using two DTMF tones for each letter; and there is at least one such protocol in use in another context. Since DTMF is widely used, the DTMF generator and decoder are readily available, although the DTMF generator which would be incorporated in the monitor is somewhat expensive at around $3 to $4.
9:07 PM, 16 Nov 2010 | Permalink
Jessica Haberer, MD, MS
Thanks for the additional information, Donald. Are you aware of any groups using DTMF in the field currently?
Regards,
Jessica
9:52 PM, 16 Nov 2010 | Permalink
Donald Ellis
Jessica,
I am not aware of anyone using DTMF in this particular context. But, I certainly don't know all that is going on.
10:55 AM, 18 Nov 2010 | Permalink
Namuro Kiaki
I actually have applied this strategy at the <a href="http://r-e-h-a-b.org/">rehab</a> facility I work for. Sometimes people are afraid to make new changes, but I guess that today's fast paced society requires change to happen more often.
9:21 AM, 11 Nov 2011 | Permalink