Translate Sign in JOIN

[ARCHIVED] Adherence & Retention

This Community is Archived.

All content of the community is available for reading, searching, and recommending, and the list of community members has been saved. No new content can be posted to the community via GHDonline.org or via email and no email notifications will be sent for the archived community. Members can neither join nor leave the archived community.

Moderators of Adherence & Retention and GHDonline staff

| More

Comparative Effectiveness of HIV Testing and Treatment in Highly Endemic Regions

Started by Sophie Beauvais on 18 Jan 2011

Context

Universal testing and treatment holds promise for reducing the burden of HIV in sub-Saharan Africa, but linkage from testing to treatment sites and retention in care are inadequate.

Objective

To compare the mortality and epidemiologic implications of linkage to care and loss to follow-up when considering universal HIV testing and treatment.

Design, Settings, and Patients

We developed a simulation of the HIV epidemic and HIV disease progression in South Africa to compare the outcomes of the present scale up (Status Quo) with four strategies to increase access to antiretroviral therapy: (1) universal testing and treatment without changes in linkage to care and loss to follow-up; (2) universal testing and treatment with improved linkage to care; (3) universal testing and treatment with reduced loss to follow-up; and (4) comprehensive HIV care with universal testing and treatment, improved linkage to care, and reduced loss to follow-up.

Main Outcome Measures

Survival benefits, new HIV infections, and HIV prevalence.

Results

Compared to the Status Quo, universal testing and treatment (1) was associated with a life expectancy gain of 12.0 (11.3–12.2) months of life, and 35.3% (32.7%–37.5%) fewer infections over a 10-year time horizon. Improved linkage to care (2), prevention of loss to follow-up (3), and comprehensive HIV care (4) provided substantial additional benefits: life expectancy gains compared to the Status Quo were 16.1, 18.6, and 22.2 months, and new infections were 55.5%, 51.4%, and 73.2% lower, respectively. In sensitivity analysis, comprehensive HIV care reduced new infections by 69.7%–76.7% under a broad set of assumptions.

Conclusions

Universal testing and treatment with current levels of linkage to care and loss to follow-up could substantially reduce the HIV death toll and new HIV infections. However, scaling up linkage to care and preventing loss to follow-up provides nearly twice the benefits of universal testing and treatment alone.

Free full text PDF at link below. Free full text HTML here: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2921232/

Attached resource:

  • Comparative Effectiveness of HIV Testing and Treatment in Highly Endemic Regions (external URL)

    Link leads to: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2921232/pdf/nihms201527.pdf

    Summary: Context

    Universal testing and treatment holds promise for reducing the burden of HIV in sub-Saharan Africa, but linkage from testing to treatment sites and retention in care are inadequate.

    Objective

    To compare the mortality and epidemiologic implications of linkage to care and loss to follow-up when considering universal HIV testing and treatment.

    Design, Settings, and Patients

    We developed a simulation of the HIV epidemic and HIV disease progression in South Africa to compare the outcomes of the present scale up (Status Quo) with four strategies to increase access to antiretroviral therapy: (1) universal testing and treatment without changes in linkage to care and loss to follow-up; (2) universal testing and treatment with improved linkage to care; (3) universal testing and treatment with reduced loss to follow-up; and (4) comprehensive HIV care with universal testing and treatment, improved linkage to care, and reduced loss to follow-up.

    Main Outcome Measures

    Survival benefits, new HIV infections, and HIV prevalence.

    Results

    Compared to the Status Quo, universal testing and treatment (1) was associated with a life expectancy gain of 12.0 (11.3–12.2) months of life, and 35.3% (32.7%–37.5%) fewer infections over a 10-year time horizon. Improved linkage to care (2), prevention of loss to follow-up (3), and comprehensive HIV care (4) provided substantial additional benefits: life expectancy gains compared to the Status Quo were 16.1, 18.6, and 22.2 months, and new infections were 55.5%, 51.4%, and 73.2% lower, respectively. In sensitivity analysis, comprehensive HIV care reduced new infections by 69.7%–76.7% under a broad set of assumptions.

    Conclusions

    Universal testing and treatment with current levels of linkage to care and loss to follow-up could substantially reduce the HIV death toll and new HIV infections. However, scaling up linkage to care and preventing loss to follow-up provides nearly twice the benefits of universal testing and treatment alone.

    Free full text PDF at link below. Free full text HTML here: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2921232/

    Source: Archives of Internal Medicine

    Publication Date: August 9, 2010

    Language: English

    Keywords: Monitoring & Measurement

Replies (0)

This Community is Archived.

All content of the community is available for reading, searching, and recommending, and the list of community members has been saved. No new content can be posted to the community via GHDonline.org or via email and no email notifications will be sent for the archived community. Members can neither join nor leave the archived community.

Moderators of Adherence & Retention and GHDonline staff