Translate Sign in JOIN

[ARCHIVED] Adherence & Retention

This Community is Archived.

All content of the community is available for reading, searching, and recommending, and the list of community members has been saved. No new content can be posted to the community via GHDonline.org or via email and no email notifications will be sent for the archived community. Members can neither join nor leave the archived community.

Moderators of Adherence & Retention and GHDonline staff

| More

Promises and Pitfalls of DOT-ART/DAART: Feedback From the 5th International Conference on HIV Treatment Adherence-Miami, FL, May 23-25, 2010

Started by Jean Nachega, MD, PhD on 24 Jun 2010
Last edited by Sophie Beauvais on 27 Oct 2010

Dear Colleagues:

For those who were not able to participate, below is a summary of the DOT-ART/DAART workshop which took place at 5th International Conference on HIV Treatment Adherence, Miami Beach, May 23-25, 2010 and sponsored by the IAPAC, NIMH and NIDA.

Is DOT-ART/DAART an effective adherence intervention strategy?
----------------------------------------------------------

No, when implemented in all HIV+ patients initiating ART (ART-naïve) in both resource-limited and rich settings (as demonstrated by meta-analysis by Ford et al. Lancet 2009; Gross et al. Arch Intern Med 2009; Nachega et al. AIDS 2010).

Yes, in specific HIV+ patients populations with documented history of struggle to adhere or to stay on ART (See recently published meta-analysis by Hart, Behforouz & Shin, JAIDS 2010)

1.Active IV drug users (Altice et al. Clin Infect Dis 2007)

2.Heavy Alcohol Abusers

3.Mentally- ill patients

4.Homeless patients (especially, if high prevalence of drug use)

5.Possibly long-term ART-experienced patients (e.g. due to treatment fatigue)

How DOT-ART/DAART Works?
------------------------------------------------------------------
1.By increasing ART adherence in the above patient populations

2.Possibly through ancillary benefits in a setting where DOT/DAART is performed by community treatment supporters/buddies (friends, family etc.) by increasing social capital/support, likelihood of access to care…and hence improves patient survival (Ware et al. PlosMed 2009; Nachega et al. AIDS 2010). Of note, these ancillary benefits are likely to be easily detected in resource-limited settings where the median CD4 count at start of ART is about 100.

The Way Forward or The Research Agenda
---------------------------------------------------------------
1.DOT-ART/DAART works in vulnerable populations mentioned above. However, as soon as the intervention is discontinued, non-adherence becomes a recurring problem (Maru & Altice, JAIDS 2009)

2.The Key question is how to proactively detect non-adherence behavior and implement an intervention before patients experience virologic failure?

3.Technological advances will increase feasibility of real-time adherence monitoring allowing us to target our adherence intervention(s) to patient(s) who need it and when they need it and therefore prevent virologic failure/disease progression, drug resistance and the need for ART regimen change (Bangsberg et al. JID 2008).

4.The cost-effectiveness of DOT-ART/DAART and other proven ART adherence interventions is badly needed in both resource-limited and rich settings (Nachega et al. Ann Intern Med.2010)

We welcome any comment(s)/question(s) on the above.

All the best,

Jean Nachega

Keywords: Clinical Guidelines  Publications & Research 

Replies (0)

This Community is Archived.

All content of the community is available for reading, searching, and recommending, and the list of community members has been saved. No new content can be posted to the community via GHDonline.org or via email and no email notifications will be sent for the archived community. Members can neither join nor leave the archived community.

Moderators of Adherence & Retention and GHDonline staff