Translate Sign in JOIN

MDR-TB Treatment & Prevention

| More

Question about Sparflox

Started by Askar Yedilbayev, MD, MPH on 27 Aug 2008

I have a question about the data on effectiveness of Sparfloxacin against strains resistant to Ofloxacin. In this case we usually use Moxifloxacin as a proven FQ agent, well tolerated but expensive, even if we do the DST for it, but literature data showed its potency. With Sparflox we do not have any data, just only the information on price – 5 times cheaper than Moxi and that it is registered in Russia.

There is a possible chance of government procurement of Sparflox. Some have said that it is more effective than Moxi, but I wanted your advice with that.

Keywords: Clinical Guidelines 

Replies (1) Add reply
1

Salmaan Keshavjee, MD, PhD

Hi Askar,

Sparfloxacin was removed from the U.S. market because of QT-interval prolongation and increased risk of heart arrhythmias. So, I think it's not a good idea to use it if you have another choice.

If using moxifloxacin is a problem, you might consider using high-dose levoquin (750 mg for people weighing less than 50 kg; 1000 mg for people weighing more than 50 kg). This is the dosing that the Iseman's group in Denver uses.

I'm attaching a paper by John Johnson at Case Western University who shows in EBA studies that it might actually be more effective than Moxi as far as early bactericidal activity.

We just had a clinical trials meeting in Cambridge and the Johns Hopkins group showed studies in mice where high dose Levo was as effective as Moxi. It is interesting because people thought Moxi was better because of the molecule; now it seems that its effectiveness might be linked to the high blood levels. Maybe that is why high-dose levo works well: it also reaches high blood levels.

Lastly, the GLC has stopped recommending OFL as it's first line anti-TB FQ and is moving toward suggesting Levo for ...

expand comment

6:07 PM, 27 Aug 2008 | Permalink