Translate Sign in JOIN

[ARCHIVED] HIV Prevention

This Community is Archived.

All content of the community is available for reading, searching, and recommending, and the list of community members has been saved. No new content can be posted to the community via GHDonline.org or via email and no email notifications will be sent for the archived community. Members can neither join nor leave the archived community.

Moderators of HIV Prevention and GHDonline staff

| More

FDA Committee Recommends TDF/FTC (Truvada) as PrEP: Summary and May 15 global call

Started by ANGELO KAGGWA on 11 May 2012

May 11, 2012

Dear Advocates,

Yesterday an Advisory Committee to the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) recommended that the antiretroviral TDF/FTC (brand name Truvada) be licensed for use as an HIV prevention tool for HIV-negative people in the US. This development moves the field one step closer to a new prevention option for HIV-negative men and women.

This update contains a link to AVAC’s press release <http://mlist.orchidsuites.net/lists/lt.php?id=KkoCCwNUXQFWCR4FC1BSAEoGDlBQAFI%3D> on the committee’s recommendation, information about a May 15 advocates’ call to discuss what this means in the US and internationally, and a brief discussion of yesterday’s historic events.

Yesterday’s Advisory Committee recommendation is not binding. The FDA will take the recommendation into account as it makes its decision whether to approve TDF/FTC for prevention, a decision that is expected on or before June 15. If the FDA does follow the committee’s recommendation, PrEP using daily TDF/FTC will be the first new, non-surgical biomedical prevention tool against sexual transmission in nearly twenty years—voluntary medical male circumcision for HIV prevention was recommended by WHO/UNAIDS in 2007; the female condom was licensed by the US FDA in 1993. For gay men and other men who have sex with men, the wait for a new option has been even longer. This new strategy would not replace condoms but would instead be an additional element of combination prevention at a moment when rates of new infections among key populations, including women and young gay men of color, are climbing.

Join AVAC and its partners for an advocates’ teleconference on Tuesday, May 15 at 10am ET (check www.timeanddate.com <http://mlist.orchidsuites.net/lists/lt.php?id=KkoCCwNUXQFWCB4FC1BSAEoGDlBQAFI%3D> for the time in your area). The call will include a review of the committee recommendation and discussion of critical next steps, with a focus on the time between now and the FDA decision in June. It will explore the outcomes of the meeting in terms of the committee’s recommendations on labeling, patient education, follow-on research and demonstration projects. It will also discuss the implications of this recommendation, and a potential FDA approval, for other countries, particularly in sub-Saharan Africa.

Register here. <http://mlist.orchidsuites.net/lists/lt.php?id=KkoCCwNUXQFXAR4FC1BSAEoGDlBQAFI%3D>

The May 10 vote to recommend TDF/FTC for PrEP took place after nearly twelve hours of presentations and testimony, including statements urging the committee to recommend approval, which came from Mitchell Warren of AVAC, Chris Collins of amfAR, Douglas Brooks of the Justice Resource Institute, Erika Aaron of Drexel University and Lindsey Dawson of the AIDS Institute. Matthew Rose, of the National Lesbian and Gay Journalists Association and a member of AVAC’s PxROAR program, spoke especially eloquently about the lack of prevention options that meet the needs of his community of young black gay men, and urged the committee to follow the science and provide another needed choice.

Committee members asked a range of questions about the trial data including side effects, the evidence showing that people with higher levels of adherence had higher levels of protection, and other issues about how to ensure safe and effective use. They also focused attention on steps Gilead Sciences, Inc., the maker of TDF/FTC, said it would take to introduce the drug with a prevention indication. The committee commented on various patient and provider education steps presented by the company and developed a list of committee suggestions for implementation and post-marketing research. It will be critical for advocates to monitor and assist with implementation of follow-on items.

The docket for public comment [no. FDA-2012-N-0218] will remain open until Thursday, May 17 (click here <http://mlist.orchidsuites.net/lists/lt.php?id=KkoCCwNUXQFXAB4FC1BSAEoGDlBQAFI%3D> for contact details for submitting comments electronically or by mail). These written comments will also be available to the FDA as it deliberates. Advocates are strongly encouraged to submit their views before the May 17 deadline.

The webcast from the proceedings should be available in the next week on the FDA website <http://mlist.orchidsuites.net/lists/lt.php?id=KkoCCwNUXQFXAx4FC1BSAEoGDlBQAFI%3D> ; a full transcript of the proceedings will not be available until next month. AVAC will post these links on its website <http://mlist.orchidsuites.net/lists/lt.php?id=KkoCCwNUXQFXAh4FC1BSAEoGDlBQAFI%3D> and on www.prepwatch.org <http://mlist.orchidsuites.net/lists/lt.php?id=KkoCCwNUXQFXBR4FC1BSAEoGDlBQAFI%3D> , a central repository of information on the FDA review and civil society voices. Background information including basic fact sheets, a summary of the PrEP pipeline and other materials can be found at www.avac.org/prep <http://mlist.orchidsuites.net/lists/lt.php?id=KkoCCwNUXQFXBB4FC1BSAEoGDlBQAFI%3D> .

We welcome your questions, ideas and suggestions in this dynamic time and look forward to welcoming you on next week’s advocates’ call <http://mlist.orchidsuites.net/lists/lt.php?id=KkoCCwNUXQFXAR4FC1BSAEoGDlBQAFI%3D> !

Best,
AVAC

Replies (3)
1

Ijeoma Itanyi

Thank you Angelo for this update!

Regards,

Ijeoma Itanyi
MBBS; MPHMBBS; MPH
Sent from my BlackBerry wireless device from MTN

2:51 PM, 11 May 2012 | Permalink

2

Mary Nnankya

If preventive treatment of people who are NOT ILL passes, how does the current data compare with immune booster food suppliments, candoms and a BIG MAYBE on male circumcision as a means of preventing HIV transmission/acquisition?

****************IMPORTANT--PLEASE READ*******************
If this electronic message contains a zipped attachment and you do not have
a decompression tool, you can download unZIP (for free) from:
http://www.mk-net-work.com/us/uz/unzip.htm. Alternatively, request
that the attachment be resent in an uncompressed format. This electronic message,
including its attachments, is CONFIDENTIAL
and may contain PROPRIETARY or LEGALLY PRIVILEGED information. If you are
not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any use, disclosure,
copying, or distribution of this message or any of the information included
in it is unauthorized and strictly prohibited. If you have received this
message in error, please immediately notify the sender by reply e-mail and
permanently delete this message and its attachments, along with any copies
thereof. Thank you. 2.2
************************************************************************

2:52 PM, 11 May 2012 | Permalink

3

K. Rivet Amico, PhD

Mary- Could you say more about your question/concerns? I do not think PrEP eliminates the efficacy of the other strategies you mention, although circumcision would not be expected to have any protective benefits for MSM. From my understanding the protective benefits of oral PrEP when taken daily or pretty close to daily are in the upper 90%s.

There are many things to consider here and emotions run high when we feel our limited resources to treat people with a diagnosed life threatening condition are going to compete with providing ARVs for prevention. And, then there are plenty of people who say that condoms work for prevention and are generally available, so why is something new needed?

Lots of beliefs and concerns and hopes and fears, but ultimately the charge to the panel was to weigh in on safety and efficacy. The pragmatics of implementation and resource allocation or competition and monitoring are the next steps. The panel’s vote in favor of adding the indication for HIV prevention, from my understanding, is based on the data collected to date regarding safety and efficacy. When an FDA decision comes, we will also see their detailed implementation plan for who ...

expand comment

11:24 AM, 13 May 2012 | Permalink

This Community is Archived.

All content of the community is available for reading, searching, and recommending, and the list of community members has been saved. No new content can be posted to the community via GHDonline.org or via email and no email notifications will be sent for the archived community. Members can neither join nor leave the archived community.

Moderators of HIV Prevention and GHDonline staff