Translate Sign in JOIN

Malaria Treatment & Prevention

  • activity_icon

    Rapid Diagnostic Tests for Malaria - From policy to end-user

    Malaria diagnosis in most endemic countries was largely based on clinical symptoms that are non-specific. This resulted in the over-diagnosis and therefore, over-treatment of malaria, negation of other non-malarial febrile illness, exertion of drug pressures on the malaria parasites with fear of early on-set of drug resistance etc. The gold standard for malaria diagnosis, microscopy, requires high skills, long training, electricity, laboratory equipment, reagents and the turn-around-time for the malaria test could be extremely long in a number of settings and thus not available to guide the prescription of antimalaria medicines. The need for a rapid malaria test was therefore imperative for an effective malaria case management. The availability of good performing malaria rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) has made the paradigm shift from clinical diagnosis to parasite-based confirmation of malaria a possibility.

    In the last decade, millions of RDTs for malaria have been implemented worldwide. These simple and easy-to-use tests can diagnose malaria from blood in about 15 minutes, making a diagnostic possible at all levels of the health system. While the tests have enabled better access to malaria diagnosis, many challenges remain.

    Members and panelists from The London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, The Foundation for Innovative New Diagnostics (FIND), The University of Lagos, The University of Yaounde I, PATH, USAID/Deliver Project, and the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) addressed many challenges in this three-part discussion: interpreting test results in context; the impact of RDTs on the behavior of health care providers; the implications of the WHO “test and treat” guidelines; as well as regulations and procurement issues.

    Read more
  • activity_icon

    Presumptive treatment, Rapid Diagnostic Test, and the need for differential diagnosis

    Effective case management of malaria is essential in the context of increasing drug resistance. The recent WHO guidelines recommend prompt parasitological confirmation by microscopy or alternatively by Rapid Diagnostic Tests (RDTs) in all patients suspected of malaria before treatment is started, and that treatment solely based on clinical suspicion should only be considered when a parasitological diagnosis is not accessible.

    In malaria-endemic countries, people commonly assume they have malaria when sick and treat themselves accordingly. Of equal concern is that negative test results—meaning no malaria—are often ignored and patients treated anyway. (Whitty, 2008; Juma, 2011). Although RDTs have been shown to be robust diagnostic tools, and a couple are commonly used in countries (Batwala, 2010; Singh, 2005), “one size does not fit all;” If parasite prevalence in the population is low, a diagnostic test is relevant; if the prevalence is high, the test does not provide information of any clinical usefulness, as happens with any test in medicine when the prevalence of the tested characteristic is high in the healthy population. (Grass, 2011)

    Members representing a broad range of health professions and organizations spanning four continents (Asia, Africa, North America and Europe) discuss challenges in misdiagnosis and presumptive treatment, as well as policy, training, and behavior change.

    Read more
Join this community Community news feed

About this community

Policymakers, national control program professionals, and practitioners problem solve and exchange best practices in this community with the goal of improving the prevention, management and treatment of malaria.

Community moderators

Johanna Daily - Albert Einstein College of Medicine of Yeshiva University; American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene

WELLINGTON OYIBO - University of Lagos College of Medicine

Michael Reddy - Yale University; Yale University School of Medicine

Community topics