Translate Sign in JOIN
This content for the Malaria Treatment & Prevention community has been flagged for moderation.

Malaria Treatment & Prevention

| More

Diagnosing malaria in Primary Care

Started by Olayinka Ayankogbe on 19 Feb 2011
Last edited by Robert Szypko on 28 Jul 2011

Excellent article.Two issues arise. 1. How do we make an accurate diagnosis of malaria at point of first contact with the primary cvare physicians who is trying to make costs as low as possible for the patient? The real problem is the classification we are using to make the diagnosis, malaria. Our diagnosis is based on using the ICD classification. However, if we use the ICPC-2 classification, our clinical judgement becomes more accurate. When I was in med school in Ibadan 28 years ago, our professors taught us, the first cause of fever is malaria, the second cause of fever is malaria, and the third cause of fever is malaria
Under the Interrnational Classification of Primary Care Version -2(ICPC-2), fever will be classified as A3. Going by clinical epidemiology therefore, everyone with fever will be traeted for malaria. Could this improve clinical diagnosis and treatment of malaria? I intend to find out
The second issue is the diagnostic competence of the attending doctor. eveidence, both emperical and scietific abound taht primary care phusicnas,(any doctor for that matter) will forget 50% of what he has been taught in med school 10 years after he laeves if he does not undergo continous medical education. So the familliarity of every health worker with malaria, which is endemic in Nigeria seems to blunt the cliniucasl skills of practitioners
Thank you

Attached resource:

Keywords: diagnostics  e.g. malaria  food security  malawi 

Replies (9) Add reply
1

MUHAMMED AFOLABI

Many thanks to Dr Ayankogbe who has introduced a practical dimension to the discourse on malaria treatment in resource-poor settings. However, the concerns raised by him are not consequential enough to justify sticking to old ways of doing things and expect different results. In those days, treating malaria with chloroguine and analgin cost about 30 naira(less than 0.2 US dollars) ; compared to the present day in which cost of malaria treatment ranges btw 10 to 30 USD. And the cause of this exponential rise in cost is not unconnected with unbridled abuse of CQ by medical practitioners and populace alike; base on the presumption that all fever is due to malaria. If we do not want the 'Tsunami' resistance to Artemisinin derivatives currently speading across Cambodia to berth in Africa, we should all insist and advocate with our colleagues to adopt malaria diagnosis before treatment. This is in spirit of Patient-Oriented Evidence that Matters.

3:38 AM, 20 Feb 2011 | Permalink

2

Olayinka Ayankogbe

Thanks afolabi. What I am advocating for is that we should look for new ways to clincally diagnose Malaria as primary care physicians.In defining “Primary Care”, I am depending on the definition by The Institute of Medicine (IOM) in America who defined Primary Care as first contact care given by clinicians. In the Nigerian Context, that means general practitioners, general duty medical officers, Specialist Family Physicians (who have been trained to be generalist specialists)and Community Health Officers. I am A Family Physician Scientist. Global generalizations if issues in medicine and health have to be applied to the specific context of local situations. Africa is as diverse as the stars of heaven and yet every one refers to scientific findings “in Africa” as if Africa were a monolithic. Africa is not monolithic. In Nigeria alone there are over 350 ethic nationalities with different languages. You cannot therefore take the research findings in say Zambia for example and apply it to Nigeria, especially in Primary Care. Also, flash in the pan interventions cannot be compared to the every day routine findings that health workers on ground are faced with. Finally, data is emerging from indigenous generalist physicians who are now ...

expand comment

10:42 AM, 21 Feb 2011 | Permalink

3

Peter Millard

As a family physician with nearly 30 years of experience and many years of experience in treating malaria, I can unequivocally say that the clinical diagnosis of malaria (that is, without any lab testing) is impossible. Many studies have shown that about 20% of cases 'clinically diagnosed' with malaria, do not have malaria. The costs of treating patients unnecessarily, in terms of medication costs, resistance, and side effects, are excessive. We must use rapid testing to guide malaria treatment. Anything less is not practicing modern medicine.

3:52 PM, 21 Feb 2011 | Permalink

4

Peter Millard

Correction: I meant to say "about 20% of cases clinically diagnosed with malaria DO have malaria." About 80% of clinical diagnosed malaria DO NOT have malaria.

3:54 PM, 21 Feb 2011 | Permalink

5

Michelle Kiprop

One of the challenges that we face at our clinic in Kenya, is that many of our patients will purchase anti-malarials over-the-counter. These medications range from Coartem, to SP, to oral quinine. They will often show up symptomatic after two days of sporadically taking several doses of the medication they bought. Any advice on how other facilities are dealing with this challenge?

2:58 AM, 22 Feb 2011 | Permalink

6

Olayinka Ayankogbe

Thanks Peter. But let me ask you sir, have you used the ICPC-2 process of diagnosis on your malaria cases?.Why dont upou use it first and then report your findings. In fact all of us lets use ICPC-2 classification to make diagnosis of malaria and lets report on our findings. To access ICPC, type ICPC-2 pager on google and download and use. And lets see what happens and please dont get me wrong. I am not saying you should not do lab investigations.I am only saying that clinical diagnosis can be more accurate than 20%. Thank you

1:52 PM, 22 Feb 2011 | Permalink

7

CONSTANCE BART-PLANGE DR

Today, I was informed of the painful death of a young man, who is yet to marry.
He was not feeling well and reported to a private hospital. His blood sample was
taken and examined under microscope. as soon as malaria parasites were seen, the
doctor did not bother to examine him IN TOTALITY, to determine whether there are
any other signs and symptoms. He was treated for malaria but he was still
unwell; he reported to another facility, and they again treated him for malaria
(on admission). He died and postportem results showed he had internal bleeding,
from a punctured spleen. He had been hit by a vehicle some weeks back, but this
fact was overlooked! This is what is happening all around us; people are dying
when they need not die. Some of our doctors and nurses have simply become
"MALARIA DOCTORS". They have become too lazy to take a full histotory and do
thorough examination. it is really tragic!




DR CONSTANCE BART-PLANGE
NATIONAL MALARIA CONTROL PROGRAM MANAGER
P.O. BOX. K.B. 493, KORLE-BU ACCRA, GHANA
TEL: 233-0302-661484 /233-244-327180/233-20-7335260
FAX/TEL: 233-0302-687982
Oh taste and see that the Lord is good !!

3:43 PM, 28 Feb 2011 | Permalink

8

ELLIOTT MATOGA

in malawi RDTs were introduced when we started using lumfantrine/artemether com,bination therapy. but it is sad to note that most clinicians still give anti malarial treatment patients with a negative RDT test. This is worisome because of concerns costs for the management of malaria and development of resistance. there is need for health worker to learn to trus their test results.

8:04 AM, 2 Mar 2011 | Permalink

9

Olayinka Ayankogbe

Dear Elliot, thanks for being honest.Out there, guidelines are not bring followed when it comes to malaria diaagnosis and treatment. Maybe because clinicians have become so used to the disease! That is why, on the field, we must promote anything that will make clinical diagnosis more accurate-like the syndromic management of STIs for example

1:23 PM, 3 Mar 2011 | Permalink