Malaria Treatment & Prevention
USAID Leader Shah remarks on the progress made toward "eliminating malaria as a major public health problem"
Started by Sarah Arnquist on 16 Feb 2011
Last edited by Sophie Beauvais on 28 Oct 2011
In his remarks Tuesday at the NIH, USAID's top leader Rajiv Shah applauded the significant progress made by the President's Malaria Initiative and other efforts at combating malaria.
"The global health community is now poised to remove malaria as a major public health problem across SubSaharan Africa," Shah said.
To finish the effort, he laid out this road map:
**Continue distributing insecticide-treated bed nets
**Improve quality, production and distribution while lowering the price to expand access to artemisinin combination therapies
**Target pregnant women for targeted treatment
**Improve point of care diagnostic tools and train community health workers to use them
**Develop new classes of insecticide that deter mosquitoes without harming the environment
**Finally, develop a cheap, effective vaccine
Then Shah remarked that in this time of fiscal austerity, major donors might be tempted to withdraw support for malaria interventions but that imprudent decision would "unwind a decade of miraculous progress." He cited Sri Lanka as a foreboding example.
Do you think Shah was overly optimistic? What do you think of the road map he laid out? Is anything missing?
Keywords: policy President's malaria initiative Rajiv Shah road map USAID Vector Control

Charles Llewellyn
I sincerely hope that Dr. Shah does not intend on ending malaria as "a
expand commentmajor public health program". While that was surely a misquote, or
mis-statement of Dr. Shah, it reflects as fear of mine as a public
health worker for the past 30 years. History shows that soon as
children stop dying, the money will go elsewhere, and malaria will
return. We do have improved tools now that can make the difference,
but they are expensive, and have to be used continually. Nets only
last a few years and they need to be replaced (although some
apparently last longer than others, I have been waiting five years for
CDC or WHO do do meaningful studies). IRS has do be done every year
and is expensive. I have been told that a malaria vaccine is just a
few years away for the past 25 years.
As Dr. Shah alluded, both the malaria parasite and vectors are very
adaptable, and it is only a matter of time until the pesticides and
medicines which are now effective will become useless. Zambia
Anopheles have developed resistance to both DDT and permethrins.
More expensive pesticides are available, but as the parasite develops
more resistance ...
11:58 AM, 16 Feb 2011 | Permalink
Sarah Arnquist
Dear Charles,
Thanks for sharing your experience and comments. You're right though that was a mistype. He wants to eliminate malaria as a public health PROBLEM.
best
sarah
2:09 PM, 16 Feb 2011 | Permalink
Michelle Kiprop
I share the same concerns as Charles regarding the shifting focus on
whatever is the current hot topic. We have seen major advances in the war
on HIV and AIDS. And with those advances funding has been withdrawn and we
are about to see the effects of those decisions.
I'm concerned with what we can realistically do on the ground at the village
level to keep the war on malaria going strong.
--
Michelle Kiprop, RN MSN
Family Nurse Practitioner
Empowering Lives International
P.O. Box 6367
Eldoret, 30100 KENYA
+254.711.174720
2:57 AM, 17 Feb 2011 | Permalink