Translate Sign in JOIN

Global Health Nursing & Midwifery

| More

WHO: Global Standards for the Initial Education of Professional Nurses and Midwives

Started by Maggie Sullivan on 26 Oct 2010

The need for global standards has arisen for several reasons – the increasing complexities in health-care provision, the increasing number of health professionals at different levels, and the need to assure more equitable access to health care.

The great variation in the levels of initial education for professional nurses and midwives around the world can no longer be neglected. Many countries still consider initial education programmes at secondary school level to be sufficient, while some countries specify university-level education as the minimum point of entry to the health professions for nurses and midwives.

This document describes the context and process followed in developing the global standards, and presents the standards with their respective goals.

WHO reference number: WHO/HRH/HPN/08
Download [pdf 853kb]

*posting courtesy of GANM (Global Alliance for Nursing and Midwifery)

Attached resource:

  • WHO: Global Standards for the Initial Education of Professional Nurses and Midwives (external URL)

    Link leads to: http://www.who.int/hrh/resources/standards/en/index.html

    Summary: The need for global standards has arisen for several reasons – the increasing complexities in health-care provision, the increasing number of health professionals at different levels, and the need to assure more equitable access to health care.

    The great variation in the levels of initial education for professional nurses and midwives around the world can no longer be neglected. Many countries still consider initial education programmes at secondary school level to be sufficient, while some countries specify university-level education as the minimum point of entry to the health professions for nurses and midwives.

    This document describes the context and process followed in developing the global standards, and presents the standards with their respective goals.

    WHO reference number: WHO/HRH/HPN/08
    Download [pdf 853kb]

    *posting courtesy of GANM (Global Alliance for Nursing and Midwifery)

    Source: World Health Organization - WHO

    Publication Date: December 31, 2009

    Language: English

    Keywords: Clinical Guidelines & Protocols, Education & Curricula, maternal health, Midwifery

Replies (7) Add reply
1

Elhassan Elhassan

Being a researcher in maternal, prenatal and neonatal morbidity and mortality and a citizen of Sudan. I see the situation of Education of Professional Nurses and Midwives in the world is disastrous and it had been so for so many decades. We have got institutes, initiatives, moves, networking and frameworks. We are left with small step of more collaboration and continental coordination. The idea that I think of significance is the approach towards problems. It needs to be practical, feasible. Valid. Reliable. Objective, sustainable and measurable.
We do not need the government to be wholly collection of scientists, but we need to consider governmental health officials, policy makers, executive’s health ministries and institutes. The injection of that scientific inspiration and soul would satisfy the need for power and if possible under the umbrella of political patronage, so as to be introduced to the political Agenda. We should not forget to convince politicians that the cake will not be divided or shared by any partner, but solely for them and this is true, by the way when comes the role of women health activists together with other tools as media.
The motivation taken by any nation must arise from within ...

expand comment

7:01 AM, 25 Jul 2012 | Permalink

2

Adanze Aguwa

As a Nigerian trained nurse and midwife who proceeded to obtain a medical degree in the united states, I do totally agree with Elhassan that the standard of education for professional nurses and midwife has disiastrously depericiated. However, I disagree that it has been for many decades. My training for both the nursing and midwifery degrees in 1985 and 1987 respectively were all at associate degree levels and hospital based. Both trainings were of superior standard that laid a solid intellectual foundation that enhanced my ability to transition to obtain a medical degree here in the United States.
However, non of the current graduates from those institutions can brag of recoding quality education. Most of those institutions have lost their accreditations and barred from admitting new students by the National Council for Nurses and Midwives due to reasons ranging from poor staff strength, dilapidated infrastructures and poor performance of students at the standardized qualifying examinations.
I agree with Elhassan that we have got institutions, initiatives, ideas and frameworks but the lapses in standards are more evident in countries with poor governance with lack of transparency and accountability. Corruption evident in most African countries is accountable for falling standards in every ...

expand comment

1:00 PM, 25 Jul 2012 | Permalink

3

Amungwa Athanasius Nche

Adanze has given a good panoramic view of pre-service training standards
and the facts are globally true though country specific. I have been the
President of the Cameroon Association of Nurses, midwives and Health
Technicians for eight years and I can say that the issue of training
standards in the country is an elephant one. There is a national curriculum
and that is the only common learning component in the learning package so
every school has its own reference manuals and the teachers use their own
training methods and learning tools, meaning nothing is really
standardized. However, this aside, the schools, particularly those from the
English-speaking regions still produce good nurses, abeit that their
practice may not be nationally harmonized.
The Ministry of Health is still to let the Association claim full authority
over the recruitment, training, certification and practice control which
for now is left in the hands of the MoH which has no clear cut monitoring
and evaluation plan for training, certifcation and practice of nurses,
midwives and health technicians. The day the Association will get full
authonomy over nursing, midwifery and health technicians training and
practice, things will change in the country. The medicolegal values of
the ...

expand comment

1:57 PM, 25 Jul 2012 | Permalink

4

Catherine Solaun

The revolution of the standardization of nurses and midwives will most certainly make healthcare access and delivery more equitable. Do you all think that this equitability problem would be solved if the leadership and power was in the hands of the nurses and midwives, rather than the MoH and Medical Doctors, OR do you think that there needs to be comprehensive studies on the present nurse& midwife training models in order to develop one to ensure consistency? In other words, which woud be more beneficial- a) advocacy in the shift of leadership from MDs to nurses&midwives OR b) the research and development of a comprehensive training model for nurses and midwives?

11:51 PM, 25 Jul 2012 | Permalink

5

Ed Arndt

I like how you think Catherine: I would like to think that having local/national nursing representation in a given MOH would possibly be more beneficial. Working with medical, HCW and nursing models would most effectively care for patients from the community to the bedside and back to the community. The work involved would be great, but the potential for consistency and sustainability would be outstanding on many levels.

8:08 AM, 26 Jul 2012 | Permalink

6

Catherine Solaun

Is anyone aware of any current MoH examples that have cohesive medical HCW, and nursing models? I am planning on doing field research about the consistency or lack there of, of nursing models in Sub-Saharan Africa next summer and have been trying to find documents that provide somewhat comprehensive list of various countries' MoH nursing models and have been having some difficulty. In order to formulate a proper thesis I need to gather whatever information there is so that I can make the research as valuable and the outcome as sustainable as possible. Does anyone have a suggestion as to where to find this information?

9:17 AM, 26 Jul 2012 | Permalink

7

Amungwa Athanasius Nche

I thank Catherine for bringing up this issue. I can't say whether shifting
responsibility over nursing and midwifery pre-service training standards
from MoH and Doctors to nurses and midwives would be the magic pill without
the precedence of properly designed job, legal and procedural tools;
without a good vlue and ethical background and a human resource and
economic policy framework within which good governance that will respire
effective communication and leadership for standards to be weaved and
sustained to create good impacts in the popuations they serve. This I
agree with Catherine will need a total revolution in the way nursing and
midwifery leaders, actors and service users will think, act to harness
nursing and midwifery principles and practice for expected results and
this will need a complete review and strengthening of the nursing and
midwifery system globally.
**

--
*Amungwa Athanasius Nche*
*Health and Development Certified Training Professional*
*P.O. Box 2157*
*Alakuma, Road-Mankon*
*Bamenda*
*North West Region *
*Cameroon*

*"Pain is temporary. It may last a minute, or an hour, or a
day, or a year, but eventually it will subside and something
else will take its place. If I quit, however, it lasts
forever."**Lance Armstrong***
**

9:48 AM, 26 Jul 2012 | Permalink