Translate Sign in JOIN
This content for the Global Health Nursing & Midwifery community has been flagged for moderation.

Global Surgery & Anesthesia

| More

Negative pressure devices for wound care

Started by Nadine Semer on 30 Mar 2010
Last edited by Sophie Beauvais on 18 Jan 2011

There are a variety of ways to create your own negative pressure wound therapy devices. This article describes one such way.

There are 3 main components:
      (1): suction capabilities,
      (2): a porous material in contact with the wound, and
      (3): a way to make an airtight seal over the wound and around tubing leading to the suction.

Sponge material as described in this article, gauze, or even OR towels are all materials that can be used directly over the wound.

If anyone has experience with making their own device, of if you have any comments/questions, please add a post.

N

Attached resource:

Keywords: Innovations for Resource-Limited Settings  wound care 

Replies (4) Add reply
1

Peter Millard

It is important to be sure that new devises are effective before promoting them. The Cochrane review suggests that there is still too little evidence that they are effective. Let's see some randomized controlled trials of their effectiveness, please.
Cochrane review summary at http://mrw.interscience.wiley.com/cochrane/clsysrev/articles/CD001898/frame.html

10:48 AM, 31 Mar 2010 | Permalink

2

Nadine Semer

You are exactly right and the reference is quite interesting- thank you. Negative pressure therapy has become an important part of wound care in the developed world and I have my concerns about its use, particularly as applied to chronic wounds. Complicated acute wounds, in my opinion are a better target for this modality and this therapy has been shown to be quite effective.

In resource poor areas, the challenges of limited nursing staff and limited dressing supplies make regular dressing changes difficult if not impossible. Negative pressure therapy offers a dressing that can stay in place for a few days at a time, keeps odor and drainage off of surrounding bedding/clothing and promotes healing- a huge benefit to appropriate patients.

12:22 AM, 1 Apr 2010 | Permalink

3

Adelaida Rivera, MD

Thank you. Perhaps other members can share information about wound care esp in resource poor areas. I have seen some clinicians use salt solution, sugar, magnesium sulfate etc and would like the opinion of surgeons regarding the use of these and other non-conventional methods. Thanks

6:30 AM, 13 Apr 2010 | Permalink

4

Robert Riviello

An important question.

Certainly using salt solutions (normal saline) to moisten gauze to make a wet-to-dry dressing for an open wound that is changed a couple times daily is standard-of-care probably in most resource-poor settings.

Raw (unboiled) honey can be a helpful agent. There are good animal studies and decent human studies that honey is helpful in disinfecting dirty wounds, and in increasing wound healing. The proposed mechanism is its energy-producing properties, its hygroscopic effect on the wound, and its bacteriocidic properties.

Sugar would work in a similar fashion, though I don't know that it is as effective as honey. I have no experience with magnesium sulfate.

Overall, the best evidence for these sort of topical agents seems to be for daily raw honey applications. One Nigerian paper sites that of 58 wounds 57 closed well with honey application. The remaining wound was found to be a Buruli ulcer needing antibiotic treatment in addition.

10:47 PM, 13 Apr 2010 | Permalink